Streisand effect - Wikipedia. The image of Barbra Streisand's Malibu house which she attempted to suppress. The Streisand effect is the phenomenon whereby an attempt to hide, remove, or censor a piece of information has the unintended consequence of publicizing the information more widely, usually facilitated by the Internet. It is an example of psychological reactance, wherein once people are aware something is being kept from them, their motivation to access and spread the information is increased.[1]It is named after American entertainer Barbra Streisand, whose 2. Malibu, California inadvertently drew further public attention to it. Similar attempts have been made, for example, in cease- and- desist letters to suppress numbers, files, and websites.

Instead of being suppressed, the information receives extensive publicity and media extensions such as videos and spoof songs, often being widely mirrored across the Internet or distributed on file- sharing networks.[2][3]Origin of the term[edit]Mike Masnick of Techdirt coined[4] the term in 2. How long is it going to take before lawyers realize that the simple act of trying to repress something they don't like online is likely to make it so that something that most people would never, ever see (like a photo of a urinal in some random beach resort) is now seen by many more people? Let's call it the Streisand Effect.[5]The term invoked Barbra Streisand who had sued photographer Kenneth Adelman and Pictopia.

The US$5. 0 million lawsuit endeavored to remove an aerial photograph of Streisand's mansion from the publicly available collection of 1. California coastline photographs.[2][7][8] Adelman photographed the beachfront property to document coastal erosion as part of the California Coastal Records Project, which was intended to influence government policymakers.[9][1. Before Streisand filed her lawsuit, "Image 3.

VOL. XXIX NO. 85 3 Sections 32 Pages P18 WEDNESDAY, MAY 13, 2015 www.manilastandardtoday.com editorial@thestandard.com.ph. The Streisand effect is the phenomenon whereby an attempt to hide, remove, or censor a piece of information has the unintended consequence of publicizing the. Dailymotion's Terms of Use. TERMS OF USE. Your use of the Dailymotion Service implies your acceptance of these Terms of Use.

Adelman's website only six times; two of those downloads were by Streisand's attorneys.[1. As a result of the case, public knowledge of the picture increased exponentially; more than 4. The lawsuit was dismissed and Streisand was ordered to pay Adelman's legal fees, which amounted to $1. In politics[edit]In November 2. Tunisia blocked access to You.

Tube and Dailymotion after material was posted of Tunisian political prisoners. Activists and their supporters then started to link the location of then- President Zine El Abidine Ben Ali's palace on Google Earth to videos about civil liberties in general. The Economist said this "turned a low- key human- rights story into a fashionable global campaign".[1. The French intelligence agency DCRI's deletion of the French- language Wikipedia article about the military radio station of Pierre- sur- Haute[1. French Wikipedia.[1. A 2. 01. 3 libel suit by Theodore Katsanevas against a Greek Wikipedia editor resulted in members of the project bringing the story to the attention of journalists.[1. By businesses[edit]In April 2.

Advanced Access Content System (AACS) encryption issued cease- and- desist letters demanding that the system's numerical key be removed from several high- profile websites, including Digg. This led to the key's proliferation across other sites and chat rooms in various formats, with one commentator describing it as having become "the most famous number on the Internet".[2. Within a month, the key had been reprinted on over 2. T- shirts and tattoos, and had appeared on You.

Tube in a song played over 4. In September 2. 00. Trafigura obtained a super- injunction to prevent The Guardian newspaper from reporting on an internal Trafigura investigation into the 2. Ivory Coast toxic waste dump scandal, and also from reporting on even the existence of the injunction. Using parliamentary privilege, Labour MP Paul Farrelly referred to the super- injunction in a parliamentary question, and on October 1. The Guardian reported that it had been gagged from reporting on the parliamentary question, in violation of the 1.

What is copyright? Watch The Mountie Streaming. Basically, copyright hinges on the question of ownership of an original work. An original work can take various forms: text, image, audio.

Bill of Rights.[2. Blogger Richard Wilson correctly identified the blocked question as referring to the Trafigura waste dump scandal, after which The Spectator suggested the same. Not long after, Trafigura began trending on Twitter, helped along by Stephen Fry's retweeting the story to his followers.[2. Twitter users soon tracked down all details of the case, and by October 1. In November 2. 01. Casey Movers, a Boston moving company threatened to sue a woman in Hingham District Court for libel in response to a negative Yelp review.

The woman's husband wrote a blog post about the situation, which was then picked up by Techdirt.[2. Consumerist[2. 7] By the end of the week, the company was reviewed by the Better Business Bureau, which later revoked its accreditation.[2. In December 2. 01. You. Tube user ghostlyrich uploaded video proof that his Samsung Galaxy S4 battery had spontaneously caught fire.

Samsung had demanded proof before honoring its warranty. Once Samsung learned of the You. Tube video, it added additional conditions to its warranty, demanding ghostlyrich delete his You. Tube video, promise not to upload similar material, officially absolve the company of all liability, waive his right to bring a lawsuit, and never make the terms of the agreement public.

Samsung also demanded that a witness cosign the settlement proposal. When ghostlyrich shared Samsung's settlement proposal online, his original video drew 1.

In August 2. 01. 4, it was reported that Union Street Guest House in Hudson, New York, had a policy that "there will be a $5. USGH [Union Street Guest House] placed on any Internet site by anyone in your party and/or attending your wedding or event."[3. The policy had been used in an attempt to suppress an unfavorable November 2.

Yelp review.[3. 2] Thousands of negative reviews of the policy were posted to Yelp and other review sites.[3. By other organizations[edit]In January 2. The Church of Scientology's attempts to get Internet websites to delete a video of Tom Cruise speaking about Scientology resulted in the creation of Project Chanology.[3. On December 5, 2. Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) added the English Wikipedia article about the 1. Scorpions album Virgin Killer to a child pornography blacklist, considering the album's cover art "a potentially illegal indecent image of a child under the age of 1.

The article quickly became one of the most popular pages on the site,[3. Watch Close Range Online Metacritic.

Bib. Me: Free Bibliography & Citation Maker.